The Barista Paradox: Why Automating Jobs Makes Workers More Valuable

Recently, while walking through the C concourse of the DFW Airport, I passed a hybrid coffee shop — part robot, part manual station. It got me thinking about what automation actually does to the value of human labor.

In this episode of the AutoIntel Audio Blog, I make the case for why automation can be beneficial for both the end user and the human team working alongside it. That's the same dynamic I see play out when engineering teams shift routine testing work to simulation and let their expertise focus on higher-value problems.

Watch the full video or read the transcript below.

‍

‍

Robot Barista: Full Audo Blog Transcript

The robots are coming for our jobs, and I think we should let them in.

Last night in the C concourse of the DFW Airport, I passed a hybrid manual robotic coffee shop. The robot was working twenty-four seven while the manual station was completely empty. The robot version of the coffee was about ten percent less expensive than the human version.

Although I bet with more competition around, it could be profitable at, say, fifty percent cheaper or more. But think about the barista.Instead of making coffee all day, what if that person spent a few days teaching a robot to do the same? [00:01:00] I think the result would be that the barista becomes more valuable, more people get cheaper coffee more frequently, and the overall economy for coffee, at least in the DFW Airport, has improved.

And as a side note, a group of kids came to watch as I was getting my coffee prepared, and I hope they were inspired to automate everything.

‍